Young earth evidence

Young earth evidence

Messenger Radiocarbon dating has transformed our understanding of the past 50, years. Professor Willard Libby produced the first radiocarbon dates in and was later awarded the Nobel Prize for his efforts. Radiocarbon dating works by comparing the three different isotopes of carbon. Isotopes of a particular element have the same number of protons in their nucleus, but different numbers of neutrons. This means that although they are very similar chemically, they have different masses. The total mass of the isotope is indicated by the numerical superscript.

The Age of the Earth

Introduction Many people have been led to believe that carbon dating along with other radioactive dating methods proves the earth to be much older than 6, years old. If the dates received from carbon dating are accurate, it would be a huge problem for those who believe in the Genesis account of creation. However, when one starts with the Bible and interprets the information received from carbon dating accordingly, one will soon learn that in no way does carbon dating disprove the young earth.

A byproduct of this atomic research has been the development and continuing refinement of the various methods and techniques used to measure the age of Earth materials. Precise dating has been accomplished since

Important We believe any unbiased reader will realize that we were fair with our treatment of the two models in the table above. Yet, although the theory of evolution matches the facts in some cases, evolution is still an unproven theory. By now, you may believe it should be your first choice also. Unlike many others that preceded us, we attempted to find a clear defense of evolution for two reasons: To keep from being accused of bias.

To keep from making claims that someone could refute later. Even though there are a great number of claims in books and on the Internet, we could find no scientific, testable facts that support the theory of evolution. The best site we could find was at The University of California at Berkeley. If you are interested, click here to examine the scientific evidence recorded at UC Berkeley yourself.

It includes lots of pictures, links to other pages, and scientific names. The site is very interesting and informative.

Methods of detecting exoplanets

Both old earth creationism and young earth creationism seek to solve the apparent conflict between science and the Bible in regard to the age of the earth. What is the apparent conflict? If the book of Genesis is interpreted strictly literally, it seems to indicate that the earth and the universe are around 6, years old. In contrast, various scientific dating methods place the age of the earth around 4. The options to solve the apparent conflict are as follows: Neither old earth creationism nor young earth creationism teaches that the Bible is wrong.

Radiocarbon dating has also been used to date the extinction of the woolly mammoth and contributed to the debate over whether modern humans and Neanderthals met. But 14 C is not just used in dating.

Early history[ edit ] In Ancient Greece , Aristotle BCE observed that fossils of seashells in rocks resembled those found on beaches — he inferred that the fossils in rocks were formed by living animals, and he reasoned that the positions of land and sea had changed over long periods of time. Leonardo da Vinci — concurred with Aristotle’s interpretation that fossils represented the remains of ancient life.

Steno argued that rock layers or strata were laid down in succession, and that each represents a “slice” of time. He also formulated the law of superposition, which states that any given stratum is probably older than those above it and younger than those below it. While Steno’s principles were simple, applying them proved challenging. Over the course of the 18th century geologists realized that: Sequences of strata often become eroded, distorted, tilted, or even inverted after deposition Strata laid down at the same time in different areas could have entirely different appearances The strata of any given area represented only part of Earth’s long history The Neptunist theories popular at this time expounded by Abraham Werner — in the late 18th century proposed that all rocks had precipitated out of a single enormous flood.

It has been said[ by whom? This theory, known as ” Plutonism", stood in contrast to the"Neptunist” flood-oriented theory. Formulation of geologic time scale[ edit ] The first serious attempts to formulate a geologic time scale that could be applied anywhere on Earth were made in the late 18th century. The most influential of those early attempts championed by Werner , among others divided the rocks of Earth’s crust into four types: Primary, Secondary, Tertiary, and Quaternary.

Each type of rock, according to the theory, formed during a specific period in Earth history.

Age of the Earth

Consequently, much attention has been given in the past decade to the development of methods involving the radioactive isotopes of the alkali metals, rubidium and potassium. These are much more common, and the potassium minerals especially are commonly found in sedimentary rocks. One of the main workers in the development of the rubidium-strontium method has been Dr.

The main question about the method has been the lack of agreement concerning the disintegration rate of rubidium.

Carbon dating thus presents a deadly challenge to young-earth creationists. If an old date is reasonably accurate, they’re out of business; if an old date is bad due to contamination, then they are still out of business because the true date is most likely older still.

This is what archaeologists use to determine the age of human-made artifacts. But carbon dating won’t work on dinosaur bones. The half-life of carbon is only 5, years, so carbon dating is only effective on samples that are less than 50, years old. Dinosaur bones, on the other hand, are millions of years old — some fossils are billions of years old. To determine the ages of these specimens, scientists need an isotope with a very long half-life.

Some of the isotopes used for this purpose are uranium , uranium and potassium , each of which has a half-life of more than a million years. Unfortunately, these elements don’t exist in dinosaur fossils themselves. Each of them typically exists in igneous rock, or rock made from cooled magma. Fossils, however, form in sedimentary rock — sediment quickly covers a dinosaur’s body, and the sediment and the bones gradually turn into rock.

But this sediment doesn’t typically include the necessary isotopes in measurable amounts. Fossils can’t form in the igneous rock that usually does contain the isotopes. The extreme temperatures of the magma would just destroy the bones. So to determine the age of sedimentary rock layers, researchers first have to find neighboring layers of Earth that include igneous rock, such as volcanic ash.

radiocarbon dating (old-earth vs. young-earth methods), assignment help

Moses Joshua It has been suggested that the Mosaic genealogies are perhaps only 20 to 40 percent complete. Those who hold that the genealogies are telescoped place the creation of Adam and Eve around 10 to 30 thousand years ago, but perhaps as late as 60, years ago. However, prior to Abraham, there is little available Biblical or historical information on which to build a solid chronology. As a result, the early Hebrew convention of including just the most historically important individuals in the genealogical record, coupled with the broad meanings of ben, ab, and yalad, raise serious questions whether the Genesis genealogies may be regarded as an absolute chronology pointing back to a 6, year-old earth.

The genealogies themselves provide a rationale for human origins dating earlier than six to ten thousand years ago.

AGE OF THE EARTH. So far scientists have not found a way to determine the exact age of the Earth directly from Earth rocks because Earth’s oldest rocks have been recycled and destroyed by the process of plate tectonics.

Reference to a case where the given method did not work This is perhaps the most common objection of all. Creationists point to instances where a given method produced a result that is clearly wrong, and then argue that therefore all such dates may be ignored. Such an argument fails on two counts: First, an instance where a method fails to work does not imply that it does not ever work.

The question is not whether there are “undatable” objects, but rather whether or not all objects cannot be dated by a given method. The fact that one wristwatch has failed to keep time properly cannot be used as a justification for discarding all watches.

What dating methods have young earthers come up with to test the age of the earth?

It cannot date fossils and rocks and can only date objects that are a few thousand years old, not millions of years old. Radiological dating gives rather extreme age variation, and its interpretation requires many assumptions. The truth is that new scientific discoveries and radiocarbon dating prove that evolution is a hoax.

Radiocarbon dating can only date an object that is about 30, or so years old. It has a half life or decay rate of 5, years, and after half lives, it becomes too small to measure. We can only use radiocarbon dating to date items several thousand years old.

Errors of % or more are common, but the public has been duped into believing radiometric dating is a highly accurate technique and proves an old age of the earth. On the contrary, radiometric dating proves the earth is young.

Abstract The geography of the garden of Eden according to the Bible interpreted literally or critically under geographic actualism indicates its location was in southern Mesopotamia. Observational data combined with the paradigm known as Flood geology, also founded on Biblical literalism, yields the conclusion that Noah’s Flood deposited over m of sediments in this region. Such deposits obviously would have obliterated the garden geography.

Thus Eden’s geography and Flood geology, both based on literalism, stand in contradiction. Some weakening of one or the other is the logically necessary outcome. Literalism is forced the least by holding to actualism in the garden geography, but then the negative impact on the Flood geology paradigm is severe. Introduction Flood Geology Is flood geology true? Geological observations of Mesopotamia show that the area has been buried by miles of rock.

Recognition of these facts have required young earth creationists to choose between the young earth paradigm and the clear teachings of Genesis 2. When forced to choose between the Bible and the young earth paradigm, young earth ministries reject biblical teaching in favor of their sacrosanct paradigm.

Radiometric dating

February 27, By dating the rocks in the ever-changing crust, as well as neighbors such as the moon and visiting meteorites, scientists have calculated that Earth is 4. How old are your rocks? Several attempts to scientifically date the planet have occurred over the past years. Scientists attempted to predict the age based on changing sea levels, the time it took for Earth or the sun to cool to present temperatures, and the salinity of the ocean.

We are told that all Scientists believe the world is old, and that all of our dating methods confirm this. The truth is, many well qualified Scientists, and lay people alike are well justified in their belief that the earth, and universe is quite young.

Here are several reasons why a young earth simply cannot be true or you could call these facts, evidence of an old earth: If there was no prehistoric world, then how did the earth end up void and darkened. God made the angels and Lucifer upright. Have you ever wondered why heavenly angels always appeared in their own bodies in the Bible, but fallen angels demons always had to have a human or animal host to inhabit? This is speculation, but I believe that the fallen angels lost their bodies when God destroyed the earth in His fierce anger in Jeremiah 4: How else did they end up disembodied spirits?

The Bible mentions over different animals and yet not one mention is made of any of the hundreds of prehistoric species in museums today. Surely if sabertooths, mammoths, dinosaurs tyrannosauruses, brontosauruses, stegosaurus, et cetera , pterodactyls and hundreds of other prehistoric and terrifying creatures had lived amongst men, they would have been mentioned in the Bible. Clearly these creatures lived in a time before time. The Bible says that Adam named every living creature Genesis 2: Adam couldn’t name the dinosaurs a term that didn’t exist until the 19th century because they were not there, that is, dinosaurs weren’t a part of the remodeling of God’s creation.

You can trace the name of every animal and bird back through history, but dinosaurs you cannot. Where did Satan come from? Clearly he was already in the Garden of Eden, so he existed before man.

Scientific Dating Methods For A Young Earth

Several Christian ministries promote the idea that the earth is less than 10, years old, which they say comes from the Bible. In reality, the Bible makes no claim as to the age of the earth, although it does establish a minimum age. This page examines some of the history of the controversy—what the Bible actually says and does not say—and the scientific evidence surrounding the age of the earth.

Age of the earth according to the Bible The following is a summary of the biblical evidence presented on this website regarding the age of the earth. For more detailed explanations of each topic, please click on the associated link. History of the age of the earth As indicated earlier, the Bible does not fix the age of the earth, contrary to the claims of Answers in Genesis.

More than 70 meteorites have fallen to Earth to have their ages calculated by radiometric dating. The oldest of these have ages between and billion years.

The Age of the Earth According to the Bible The chronological information in Genesis has been verified repeatedly and so Bible genealogies and the statements of Jesus imply a ‘Young Earth’ See also Young Earth dating theory and Old Earth dating theory There are strong biblical arguments to support the scientifically based theory of a Young Earth – an earth less than 10, years old! Theology itself, on a straight reading, does not support the evolutionist claims of an Old Earth – an earth some 4.

Was Adam a real man? If we can establish Adam as a real man, then the biblical genealogies may give a good idea of the age of the earth. A literal interpretation of Genesis suggests that all living land creatures, including man, were created as herbivores rather than carnivores Gen 1. The concept of killing for food is absent from the early world of Genesis.

Radioactive Dating & A Young Earth

Sorry, something has gone wrong. This assumes that the Genesis account is accurate, that the six days of creation were literal hour periods, and that there were no ambiguous gaps in the chronology of Genesis. The genealogies listed in Genesis chapters 5 and 11 provide the age at which Adam and his descendants each fathered the next generation in a successive ancestral line from Adam to Abraham. By determining where Abraham fits into history chronologically and adding up the ages provided in Genesis 5 and 11, it becomes apparent that the Bible teaches the earth to be about years old, give or take a few hundred years.

What about the billions of years accepted by most scientists today and taught in the vast majority of our academic institutions? This age is primarily derived from two dating techniques:

Young earth evidence consists of observations that support a belief in a “young” earth (i.e., recent creation) that is only thousands of years old more easily than belief in an “old” earth that is billions of years old. Such evidence may be found in logical arguments regarding scientific data, historical documents, or some combination of the two.

Therefore it should come as no surprise that creationists at the Institute for Creation Research ICR have been trying desperately to discredit this method for years. They have their work cut out for them, however, because radiocarbon C dating is one of the most reliable of all the radiometric dating methods. This article will answer several of the most common creationist attacks on carbon dating, using the question-answer format that has proved so useful to lecturers and debaters.

How does carbon dating work? Cosmic rays in the upper atmosphere are constantly converting the isotope nitrogen N into carbon C or radiocarbon. Living organisms are constantly incorporating this C into their bodies along with other carbon isotopes.

Young earth scientific evidence the earth is only 6000 years old



Hi! Do you want find a sex partner? It is easy! Click here, registration is free!